Archive for December, 2005

…BANG, ZOOOM! Every year on New Years Eve, the 2…

December 31, 2005


…BANG, ZOOOM!

Every year on New Years Eve, the 24-hour Honeymooners marathon on channel 11 brings me back to the eternal question:

Ralph Kramden or Ed Norton—who do ya like?

It’s one of the big questions, one I have given much thought to. And I would like this year to publicly state my preference for:

Ralph Kramden.

I’d like to explain my position, but first I must acknowledge Norton’s greatness. Art Carney is a funny man who created a unique character that lights up every room he stumbles into. Norton, I’m willing to concede, might be funnier, on a laughs-per-minute basis, than Kramden.

But one does not come to experience an episode—or 39 back-to-back episodes—of the Honeymooners simply to laugh any more than one reads, say, William’s Vision of Piers Ploghman (1380) strictly for the yucks. One comes to the Honeymooners for edification, for art, for the sublime. In many ways, I find that the Honeymooners is not at all unlike that earlier work in English, not only because the dialog is composed in unrhymed alliterative verse, but also because of its brilliant explication of our hero’s intense quest for the true Christian life, in terms of the medieval Catholic mind–except for the Christian and Catholic part.

Keep in mind that while Norton may light up a room, most of the space in the room is usually taken up—by Kramden. Ralph fills about a third of the room physically, another third metaphysically. Jackie Gleason had a presence and a kind of static behemoth grace. He added pathos to the sitcom. Sum total: Gravitas, something along the line of a Willie Lowman whose show must go on.

The beauty of Norton, really, is that he pulls back the cheesecloth to reveal this paragon, this emblem of ourselves busting the buttons of public service schmatas. The Honeymooners works on the principle of Kramden as the tragicomic hero with Norton as his foil and fool. The wisdom that leaps like uncontrollable burps from the ostensibly dim and happy Norton serves to frame our hero’s humanity. And that humanity centers on a hunger to transcend—to transcend, primarily, the stickwood-furnished New York apartment that he shares with his long-suffering wife. Alice, in fact, is the foil on the other side of the display, providing a constant contrast to Ralph’s incessant corner-cutting and reckless ambition.

Well, I’ll gladly admit that Kramden is a lot more like me than are either Ed or Alice. I’ve got a little Trixie in me, but for the most part I identify with Kramden. What is there, really, to a guy like Norton who barrels through everything with a kind of goofball joi de vivre. Give him his baloney sandwich, and he’s happy to go back down in the hole. Ralph will never settle for perpetuity at the beck and call of the MTA. He will not spend the rest of his life in that little apartment, if he has any say in it. Apparently he doesn’t have much say, trapped, as he is, in a world that he never made. But that only makes him hungrier.

Recently I was made aware of an on-line compatibility tool—Dr. Love (thanks Meg at Blogcabin). You go to Dr. Love, put in your name and your partner’s, and you get a percentage of likelihood that your relationship will endure. Ralph and Alice come up with a 33%. Dr. Love interprets thus:

“The chance of a relationship working out between Ralph and Alice is not very big, but a relationship is very well possible, if the two of you really want it to [sic], and are prepared to make some sacrifices for it. You’ll have to spend a lot of quality time together. You must be aware of the fact that this relationship might not work out at all, no matter how much time you invest in it.”

Bingo! If they still made sitcoms, Dr. Love’s spiel would be a heaven-sent premise for a new half-hour comedy that would revive Thursday night at NBC. It’s the marriage, stupid! That’s why the show is called the Honeymooners! If it weren’t for Alice, Ralph would go right off the tracks. If it weren’t for Ralph, life would be so monotonous and meaningless that Alice would rest her head on the tracks and wait for the uptown 4 or 5. Marriage, mother-in-law aside, may be the one predicament that Kramden can tolerate. It is the accepted rule of his game, his salvation episode after episode–with 33% odds. It’s beautiful, baby!

Don’t put too much store in Dr Love, however. He gives Ed and Trixie a 26% chance of making it with twaddle somewhat slightly bleaker than that accompanying the Kramden’s 33%. I think, though, that Dr. Love is simply thrown off by women with names like “Trixie”, because, from what I’ve seen, the Nortons are trapped in a marriage with a near 100% success prognosis.

Thank God for Ralph. The brooding, conflicted master of negative space. The gouty Pierrot, the tragic clown and conjurer of grand schemes. I am on his bus. Thank God also for The Great One, bartender to Crazy Guggenheim, a man who threw parties on–and for the duration of–cross-country train trips. Parties for his friends.

What’s more, I know that my mother-in-law prefers Norton.

Wake me when it’s over,
Vanx

______

Photos of interest:

Second from bottom: Crazy Guggenheim serenades the bartender on my mom’s TV at Christmastime, circa 1984

Above: The Ralph Kramden statue placed by Viacom’s TV Land outside the Port Authority bus station in New York City (TV Land was less successful in putting Samantha from Bewitched in Salem, MA, earlier this year. That’s neither here nor there.)

I find… : 1) …that the voices in my head talk …

December 22, 2005

I find… :

1) …that the voices in my head talk to each other about people and events that I am unfamiliar with. They ignore me completely. It’s like being snubbed at a cocktail party where I’ve paid for all the drinks.

2) …too many photographs of someone named Jennifer Anniston. Everywhere. What has she done?

3) …that my boss will read, slowly and directly into the speaker phone, a note I slip him during our conference call meeting that says: “I have to go to the men’s room”. There is usually mixed company in Europe and Asia on the call.

4) … that biopharmaceutical companies are starting to name themselves after post-impressionist and modernist art movements. Nabi Biopharmaceuticals, for example. And Cubist Pharmaceuticals. What’s next, DadaGene? Surrealist Therapeutics?

5) …a good number of photographs of someone named Angelina Jolie. I believe she’s French.

6) …that the woman tailgating me in the gleaming Mercedes Benz on the Parkway this morning is wearing a fur coat and picking her nose.

7) …that going to the movies is the first casualty of parenthood, and that parenthood lasts pretty much forever.

8) …a lot of photographs of a guy named Brad Pitt. He must be very popular. And it seems like Jennifer Anniston and Angelina Jolie have been fighting over him for almost a year now! Lucky guy.

9) …that I am exposed to reams of monotonous Tabloid Bullshit while standing in the check-out at the supermarket. I forget a lot of important things I read in books. But I can’t shake the Tabloid Bullshit.

10) …that the voices in my head are often talking about Tabloid Bullshit.

I Love New YorkStatistical Strikewear of the 1980s…

December 21, 2005
I Love New York
Statistical Strikewear of the 1980s


I used to work with a statistician called Statz. He was not like other statisticians.

When it rained, Statz came to work wearing swimmer’s goggles, a Yankees batter’s helmet, and a strap-on cylindrical “brief case”—sort of a black vinyl tube. He started wearing these things on rainy days during the 1980 transit strike when he’d ride his bike from the Upper West Side to our office in Greenwich Village. The helmet and goggles kept his head dry and held his sideburns in place. The “briefcase” would be strapped to his leg with red shoelaces like the ones he used in the office to bind hole-punched paper into four-foot stacks. He had an impermeable tweed jacket and smoked a pipe in which tobacco was held in place for ages by one of those plastic whirligigs you use to convert the big hole in a record to a little hole. The whirligig was secured to the pipe by a cluster of rubber bands.

To be honest, I don’t know if the pipe rig was originally part of his strike armor. If not, it became a key accessory later, so I count it in.

Statz had a lot of firepower under that helmet, which made verbal communication with him exhausting. By means of a series of arcane assumptions as to the likely progress of discourse, Statz would propel himself about two minutes ahead of real-time in any conversation. You’d slog through his seeming non-sequiturs, eventually realizing that strange things he’d said several minutes earlier really made sense. But by that time, it was too late! Statz was way ahead in a conversation that hadn’t really begun, and there was little chance of your catching up.

Sometimes, riding to work on the subway on a rainy day, some kid would see Statz wearing his Yankees helmet and try to engage him in banter about the previous night’s game.

Kid: “How ‘bout those Yanks, yo.”

Statz: “It’s OK, there’s no dairy in this coffee.”

Kid:—

(Editor’s note: It must be said that Statz didn’t know or care much about baseball.)

I doubt the current transit strike will give birth to such a unique look as the helmet-goggles-tube-and-pipe (maybe) combo. Who’d even notice these days? I also know that wherever Statz is working this week, he’s getting in on time, warm, and dry.

So, here’s to you, Statz! Ride the strike, brother!

Statz: “No, but that comes down to the vagaries of HTML”

…Right!

Symphonie Santastique Agence France-Presse photo …

December 19, 2005
Symphonie Santastique

Agence France-Presse photo

Speak, Ghost Whereat the ghost of "Memorie" inton…

December 17, 2005

Speak, Ghost

Whereat the ghost of “Memorie” intones the language of “Memoir”

My Grandmother

We are in the Impala on our way to Manasquan. I’m sitting in the back seat behind her straw hat with the flowers. Grandma is driving to the Garden State Parkway, taking the same route she has since the Parkway opened in the early 1950s–a meandering course through downtown Newark. My father could never persuade her to hop on at any of the several Parkway accesses closer to the burgeoning suburban neighborhood where she had come to live with us in 1961. Now it’s the summer of 1967, we’re headed for the Parkway, and downtown Newark is hosting a riot. “Hey Grandma,” I say, excited as only a ten-year old could be at the sight. “I see a tank!”

She ignores me. She was all too used to silliness coming from the back seat, and she was looking for the Parkway. I would have one more year with Grandma.

And she with me. You see, I was Grandma Mullin’s raison d’etre. Her boy. She took me every week during the summer to spend two or three days at her sister’s little white house with the red roof on the Shark River Inlet, which runs between Manasquan and Point Pleasant, NJ, into the Atlantic Ocean. My first memory of her is at the shore, in fact, at the house with my Aunt Mabel, Uncle Adrian, and my beloved cousin Steve. A second cousin, about a year older than me, Steve initiated me into the ways of the beachcomber. That’s basically what we did half the time we were together.

The other half we spent in the back seat of the Impala being driven by our grandmothers, usually to yarn shops. We would roll around on the floor of the car with whatever toys we’d brought until we attained a state of what our grandmothers simply called “silliness”. They would recognized simultaneously when we’d cross the line, and would begin flailing their arms-of-many-clunky-bracelets randomly in our direction with no pause in their conversation. Steve and I would laugh about it on the back porch later.

Memory is a multi-sensory function. Heavily olfactory. I remember the smell of Aunt Mabel’s kitchen, which was either the smell of breakfast or of fish when Uncle Adrian and Uncle Bert—our grandmothers’ younger brother—came back from fishing on Uncle Adrian’s boat in the afternoon. The Grandmas and Aunt Ches, Uncle Bert’s wife, cleaned the fish in the kitchen sink with their hair tied up in blue and grey scarves. There were other smells from a wooden cupboard that I remember—black liquorice, Hydrox cookies, and big, salty stick pretzels. Then there was the smell of my grandmother. That I knew better from home, where, when I woke up in the middle of the night or on most mornings, I would climb into bed with Grandma. That is something only I know.

But, wait! Steve remembers smells as well. The following is from an e-mail that he dashed off when I hinted I would be posting something on Grandma: “I’m almost too frightened to read anything on a blog created by you, let alone reminiscences (true or fictional) about childhood. Please don’t shatter my images of your grandmother, all I really remember is an extremely nice lady who smelled good and whose bracelets made the same horrible racket as my grandmother’s did”.

Yeah, when they were whacking at us in the back seat!

Steve goes on a bit about their hairdressing habits. That made less of an impression on me, but he’s right. They shampooed once a month in order to get full value out of their elaborate hairdos, hitting the beach in neoprene turbans that looked pretty swell with their bathing suit-cum-apron outfits. Walking us to the beach, past Carlson’s Corner, the big white soda shop, in their better-living-through-chemistry beachwear of the 1960s, they were wont to remind us of an afternoon not to gawk at the young couples “necking”. On such occasions, they demonstrated that their reflexes were far faster then the synapses of little boys. The swats were landing before we even had a chance to laugh. Dodging this fusillade, we’d collapse onto the crunchy-clipped grass and gravel of whoever’s front yard we’d reached when the “neckers” were spotted, laughing our little asses off, as a fun song about a Pinball Wizard played on the juke box at Carlson’s.

It was a good thing for me that in Grandma’s Copernican worldview, I represented the Sun. She was a fairly unyielding woman–the term “Prussian rectitude” comes to mind. My Grandfather left her for, of all places, Texas when my father, their only child, was about three. Grandpa’s story was carefully kept out of circulation in my home. Whenever I asked about my grandfathers, they would say they both died when I was a baby. That was true of my mother’s dad. Dad’s dad eventually died when I was in second or third grade. I distinctly remember them telling me that Grandma and Daddy had to go to Texas.
“How come?” I ask.
“Because your grandfather died.”

“Again?”

Years later, Uncle Bert, the only one in the family who’d gladly talk about Grandpa Mullin, told me Grandpa, “took a fall for a crooked judge in Newark.” Great. Uncle Bert painted it in rather broad strokes, unfortunately. But as he got older, he remembered it differently. My grandmother was the oldest of the six Bergesser children. Bert, the youngest. “She raised me, and I loved her like my mother, see,” sez Bert. “But she was a cold woman, see. I liked Bill Mullin.” What are you saying, Uncle Bert? That Grandma drove her husband to Texas? “Yeah, yeah, that’s right,” sez Bert.

I will die confused on this point. My mother, a Massachusetts-stock Episcopalian who converted to Catholicism at Grandma’s insistence, knows about as much as I do. Dad never talked about it. He died when I was 24, and I’ve pretty much pumped Bert dry.

I do know, however, that Grandma’s rigid Catholicism meant that she would never grant my grandfather a divorce. (Two strange ladies in Texas used to send us Christmas cards. I believe they are my aunts.) Grandma was proposed to repeatedly by her boss in later years, an Italian gentleman who started on these shores as a ragman in Newark and went on to own an insurance company.(1)

Grandma, a one-time Navy WAVE who largely ran this man’s insurance company, was very strict with my father. Of course she was—She raised him during the depression, a single mother endowed with a Prussian rectitude. My father never defied her authority, even in his own house as an adult.

I crossed her only once–but she was dead wrong! Lemme tell ya:

Grandma took me to Radio City Music Hall to see the Christmas show. I had a remarkable little suit on. It was probably about 1965 or -6. (All my memories of her have a kind of old photograph, Technicolor, Turnerized tinge to them—especially the memories that involved New York City, of which there were a few). So, here we are on a serpentine line on Sixth Avenue. She strikes up a conversation with the woman in front of us. Soon she wants coffee. She tells me to stay with the strange woman while she goes somewhere in the big crowded city to get coffee (later in life I would understand this kind of coffee addict’s behavior). The line is starting to move. The woman clearly grimaces a “What, are you kidding lady?” grimace. Then I say it, I think, for the first time ever to my grandmother: “No”

A few minutes later, we are sitting in a coffee shop on the spinning round seats at the counter. Grandma is going on at length to the cigarette-smoking hash-slinger behind the counter about what a bad boy I’d been.

“Why don’t you listen to your grandma, kid?”

….Shadd-ep, bub.

When I get home, my father feels he has to make a great showing in response to my transgression. He proceeds, unbelievably, to make himself the moax in all of this by coming down ridiculously hard. We was actually taking off the belt! (Grandma was not there and would not have gone for this, mind you). Mom is the hero in this scene, not only stopping my Father, but telling him that Grandma did an insane thing and that I was in the right. Sometimes Mom and I recall this eventful day as, perhaps, the most crystalline manifestation of “the Mullin problem.”

Phew! Now….. That was the worst of it.

The best, other than waking up and snuggling into bed with her on a cold winter morning, may have been those rides to Manasquan. She gave me a feel for the old cities where she lived most of her life. Newark, the Oranges–the world that all her gab with Aunt Mable tracked back to. Living in the fast-developing greenery of East Hanover, I may have learned to fear these places. But now, cruising under the giant Pabst Blue Ribbon Bottle water tower at the factory in Newark– a famous New Jersey landmark situated near Grandma’s preferred entrance to the Parkway–I’m in my element. The bottle tower and its environs will always bring back a sun-filled scene and the vision of a straw hat bobbing in front of me.

Somehow, I managed to sleep through the night that my grandmother had her heart attack. The first aid squad carried her downstairs from her room, which was across the hall from mine. They knocked over a card table on which I had been working a rather difficult puzzle—hundreds of pieces—of Leonardo’s Last Supper. My mother told me that Grandma, strapped to the gurney, mid-heart attack, actually yelled at them for messing my puzzle up. I never saw her alive again.

At her wake, I stood alone with my father when they opened her coffin. He collapsed, crying uncontrollably. His mother was his world, and the future must have seemed unbearable to him. That’s a hard thing for an 11-year-old to watch. Uncle Bert came in and picked him up, as he had done for my grandmother so many times when Dad was a boy. The childless Bert had paid Grandma back for all the love and protection she’d given him by being the man in my father’s life—a man of Prussian rectitude, as my father usually described him.

“C’mon Dick,” Bert said to my father that evening. “Stand up.”

Twelve years after this scene, my father committed suicide. He hid or destroyed his wallet, smoked, by my count, the second cigarette of his life, and left no note–just a cigarette butt and another guessing game for me and Mom, who was, by then, the mother of three (my sister Patricia had been born a month before Grandma died. Jennifer came two years after that).

Grandma is still with me, of course. You don’t watch the Beatles on Ed Sullivan with someone and forget her. You don’t sneak into someone’s bedroom at the age of ten to watch the Tonight Show with Johnny Carson and forget about her. You always remember the adult that makes you eat egg salad sandwiches on the beach. If Uncle Bert is wrong about anything–and I think he may be–it is that my grandmother was cold. She was warm. And she smelled great.

And of course there are still constant reminders, though some are on their way out. I recently switched jobs after 25 years of commuting to New York on trains. I now drive to an office in Edison on the Parkway. Every morning, usually under a Van Gogh sunburst, I see the Pabst bottle (2) dominating the angel statuary in the big cemetery by the Parkway and casting a shadow over the row houses next to the big blue building called Stock House 14. I read in the Star Ledger about an archaeologist in Newark scavenging the factory and making furniture out of its bizarre fixtures ahead of a demolition crew that, no doubt, has the water tower on its list.

I still have Uncle Bert, who will really be 100 in about a year! He is down in Cape May with the feisty, 96-year-old Aunt Ches, that lovable, loud-talking Detroit woman who fit right in with the Bergesser girls. And I have cousin Steve, the best man at my wedding, a rare, kind and giving soul. Look at him in that picture up there. He’s perfect! He is my Grandma channel, in a sense. I hope he will not be too aghast at my remembrance of our grandmothers.

Closer to home, my wife wears Grandma’s diamond in her engagement ring, as Grandma had hoped my wife one day would. Not exactly a good luck charm, you might say. But, hey, it’s worked for 21 years.

And, of course there is my beautiful daughter, Marguerite, Grandma’s namesake.

(1) Catholicism, I’m convinced, is Western civilization’s grand conspiracy against me.
(2) Which, after a doing a stretch as a Schweppes Ginger Ale bottle, is now just a rust-red bottle shape on War-of-the-World spaceship legs. A beautiful rust-red bottle shape, that is.

Photos: Top to bottom
I see a Tank: The National Guard move into downtown Newark, 1967.
Before I knew her: Marguerite Bergesser in East Orange, 1920s.
Beachcombers in Saddle Shoes: Ricky, left, and Stevie.
Tex: Grandpa, we hardly knew ye!
The Lost World: Pabst! Blue! Ribbon!
Marguerite: Apple of our eyes.

Go back for a great picture of Grandma in an earlier post

Three Sonnets Stony Grass The black and white th…

December 16, 2005

Three Sonnets

Stony Grass

The black and white that passed in years before
My birth I channel in at forty-eight,
Before the imitated Ginsberg bore
His howl into the dormitory, late
Behind New Jersey’s greystone gates and grass,
Before the cigarette my father lit
Before the Exeunt was labeled, ass
And tackle where I brought the knife. The Hit-
And-Split? He hit that note precisely. Why
Detectives’ sharp and anxious questions pass
Before my mother sees me suspect by
The window onto March and stony grass
I might have known, had I, not turning in,
Turned out to see beyond my father’s chin.

Painting Keuka Lake

When I get to my studio I think
I’ll add an energetic little girl
Who runs along the dock to cast her pink-
And yellow-bobbered line into the swirl
Of greenish-gray acrylic–that’s the lake
On Monday afternoon.

I hit the whites,
Illuminating purple clouds that rake
And scud across the bluff and slide from sight.
(It’s cold and I work fast on hands and knees)
Alizarin and phthalo blue are churned
To capture temperature, the light and trees,
The wind—

Forgetting everything I’ve learned,
I push the image. Nature pushes back.
I counter with a little girl’s attack.

The Parts of Mouse

Delineate the parts of “Mouse” again because
I want to sleep. But show me, wake me if
Your kinder-spelling fails.

The little paws,
Attentive ears, the whiskers blue and stiff.

I stayed up late to hear the Sultan’s plea,
To see the ring of orange shadows pool
About the kettle.

Everyone will see
Those beady eyes. And all your friends at school
Will envy this new diagram of yours.

And I will slowly call to mind when I
Awake, the harmony, the altered course
Of colors through the mosque, the desert sky.

You’ll finish by the time I’m seeing straight.
You’ll be half dressed at breakfast,
We’ll be late.

Book Review DON’T TELL FERDINAND AND ISABELLA THE…

December 15, 2005


Book Review
DON’T TELL FERDINAND AND ISABELLA
THE WORLD IS FLAT: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century, by Thomas L. Friedman
Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2005. 469 pages, $27.50 (ISBN 0-374-29288-4)

By Rick Mullin
Not many people today are startled by the fact that everyone from Taco Bell to Texas Instruments is doing business in Bangalore. This realization, however, shocked Thomas L. Friedman when he visited the city a couple of years ago. The trip also gave Friedman, a columnist for the New York Times, the perfect metaphor for a world that he feels is fundamentally changed by the social, political, economic, and technological upheavals and megatrends of the last fifteen years.

His new book, The World is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century, uses the concept of a worldwide level playing field to explain how individuals, companies, and nations—not to mention globally-dispersed terror networks—will martial collaborative technologies, primarily the Internet, to advance themselves in a landscape no longer demarcated by regional, national, and political boundaries.

Friedman, a rather high-minded hand wringer in general, mixes utopian optimism with grave misgivings, most of which hinging on regional and personal preparedness to take advantage of a flourish of big opportunities. As such, the flat world he describes will do much to advance countries we already see making great strides forward—most notably India, China, and the rest of Asia—while presenting Latin America, Africa, Europe and the U.S., with daunting challenges.

Friedman’s book is particularly critical of the Bush Administration for, as he sees it, focusing too much energy on a protracted war in Iraq and the boundless war on terror, and too little energy on preparing Americans to thrive in a highly competitive world. While the book is premised on the eradication of boundaries as a fait ascompli, much of the emphasis is, in fact, on the U.S., where for every hope of advancement Friedman sees several deeply disturbing countertrends. Many of these have been fairly well covered elsewhere.

Friedman devotes considerable space, for example, to contrasting a diligent work ethic and emphasis on science education in Asia with a sense of entitlement and dearth of ambition among American students that is matched only by the U.S. government’s neglect. He cites a 2004 study by the Task Force on the Future of American Innovation, an industrial-academic coalition, calling for a 10- to 12% annual increase for the next four to seven years in the budgets of the National Science Foundation and other agencies that fund academic research in order to sustain current levels of job creation in the sciences. The 2005 budget passed by the Republican-led Congress last November, however, cut NSF’s $5.7 billion budget by more than 3%.

Another missed opportunity, according to Friedman, is the government’s failure to devote adequate funding to the development of clean alternative energy. Here he sees a massive black eye for the legacy of our current president. “Summoning all our energies and skills to produce a twenty-first-century fuel is George W. Bush’s opportunity to be both Nixon to China and JFK to the moon in one move,” Friedman writes.

He laments that there is more of a chance that he himself will go to the moon than that President Bush will take on the fossil fuel dependency that shackles the U.S. in very negative ways to another region of the so-called flat world, the Middle East. The problem, according to Friedman, is the same one at root of all lost opportunities in the flat world—a lack of imagination.

Friedman brings a kind of naïve enthusiasm to his encounters with things like modern technology, supply chain management, Internet entrepreneurs and outsourcing. Sadly, much of this comes from a kind of elitist detachment—at time he comes off like the elder President Bush confronting the price scanner at the local super market. He even titles his first chapter “While I was Sleeping.” And Friedman, recipient of three Pulitzer Prizes in journalism for coverage of the Middle East, can be infuriating at times in his lavish indulgence in every extravagance known to punditry (the effect is far worse when he speaks on TV or the radio).

Yet he overcomes all of this with his boundless journalistic inquisitiveness and his writer’s ability to “connect the dots.” Friedman excels at simplifying and communicating complex arrays of information, and his agenda is purely humanistic.

His technique of employing coincidental contrasts keeps things lively. He compares, for example, 11/9 to 9/11 (the Berlin Wall was opened to unrestricted transit on November, 9, 1989/al-Quaeda attacked the U.S. on September 11, 2001) and David Needleman to Osama bin Laden (the founder of Jet Blue and the mastermind of 9/11 both, in Friedman’s words, started airlines using the same collaborative technologies in 1999). These contrasts also serve to clearly illustrate the potential for good and evil in Friedman’s compelling vision of the flat-worlded 21st Century.

This review appeared in Chemical & Engineering News.

Now on View to the Public MY VOTING RECORD The M…

December 15, 2005

Now on View to the Public
MY VOTING RECORD


The Make-Believe Votes

1) 1964–My first vote was cast by clicking a toggle switch that they rigged up on a piece of plywood for kids at the polls. I voted for Johnson because of a Time Magazine article I had read on Goldwater in my parent’s bedroom one morning while they were still sleeping.
2) 1968—My second vote was cast in leaves on Cutter Drive.
H H H, spelled out in leaves. I thought Goldwater was scary. But Nixon????

The For-Real Votes

1) 1976—I voted for Ford. Don’t ask.
2) 1980—I did what I should have done in 1976. Don’t ask.
3) 1984, 88, 92, 96, 2000, 2004: Straight-line Democrat.

Prediction for 2008: Back to make-believe voting.

The High-Maintenance Head I’ve been going kind o…

December 14, 2005
The High-Maintenance Head


I‘ve been going kind of easy on the head. Weekly goatee maintenance–that’s about it. It’s the inexorable march to a gray ponytail–a look that was big in these parts in the 1990s and the 1400s.
Right now, however, I’m going through an awkward stretch–the “High-Maintenance Head” stage during which I can’t pull enough hair back behind my enormous, spherical cranium to get a good knot. So I need to deploy a battery of mechanical and chemical fasteners in order to maintain even a minimum, Doobie Brother level of propriety.

Please. Don’t look at me. Until March

On The Transubstantiation of the Eggnog Our embed…

December 14, 2005

On The Transubstantiation of the Eggnog

Our embedded reporter at the annual Chemists’ Club Eggnog Dinner in New York tonight reports the following cabalistic incantation spoken over the eggnog bowl (verbatim)

We have hardened our hearts to the fraudulent Jesus
In search of the goop that Hobbes told us to find.
Soon nano-materials will no longer tease us
Like vaporous robots inhaled through the mind.

Chemo-octogenari, coalesce in Manhattan
At the midpoint twixt Broadway and Fifth Avenue,

To dwell on black practice and babble in Latin,
Disguising our Mass as a
fete
of the Yule!

O bring forth the cauldron, you fatmen among us !
We, decrepit in top hats, tuxedoed demise,
Bow to Lord Mammon, who’ll fondle and tongue us!
Bring the Buckminster Birdcage! The Newt with four eyes!

Pour buckets of eggnog, that sickening dairy,
Bring encrusted bottles and powder-filled horns!
From formulae whispered to Otto by Larry,
Form the glutinous spackle:
petroleum-based corn!

Editor’s Note: At this point, several 40-year members caught a little air. The PR woman from Ogilvy was really freaked out.